Article info
PDFPapers
Genetics
Paper
An analysis of US fertility centre educational materials suggests that informed consent for preimplantation genetic diagnosis may be inadequate
- Correspondence to Dr Michelle Lynne LaBonte, Department of Biological Sciences, Wellesley College, 106 Central Street, Wellesley, MA 02481, USA; mlabonte{at}wellesley.edu
Citation
An analysis of US fertility centre educational materials suggests that informed consent for preimplantation genetic diagnosis may be inadequate
Publication history
- Received July 30, 2011
- Revised February 7, 2012
- Accepted March 2, 2012
- First published April 6, 2012.
Online issue publication
June 23, 2021
Article Versions
- Previous version (23 June 2021).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- Extending preimplantation genetic diagnosis: medical and non-medical uses
- Britain’s new preimplantation tissue typing policy: an ethical defence
- Just diagnosis? Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and injustices to disabled people
- Preimplantation genetic testing
- Sex selection for social purposes in Israel: quest for the “perfect child” of a particular gender or centuries old prejudice against women?
- Clinical applications of preimplantation genetic testing
- Preimplantation genetic diagnosis in clinical practice
- Establishing the role of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis with human leucocyte antigen typing: what place do “saviour siblings” have in paediatric transplantation?
- Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and rational choice under risk or uncertainty
- Gender “tailored” conceptions: should the option of embryo gender selection be available to infertile couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology?