Article info
PDFCommentary
Opt-out donation and tacit consent: a reply to Wilkinson and De Wispelaere
- Correspondence to Dr Ben Saunders, Philosophy, Pathfoot Building, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK; ben.saunders{at}stir.ac.uk
Citation
Opt-out donation and tacit consent: a reply to Wilkinson and De Wispelaere
Publication history
- Received November 2, 2011
- Accepted November 18, 2011
- First published December 13, 2011.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- Opt-out organ donation without presumptions
- Tacitly consenting to donate one's organs
- Understanding (and) consent: a response to MacKay
- Opt-out organ procurement and tacit consent
- Tacitly opting out of organ donation: too presumptuous after all?
- Normative consent and opt-out organ donation
- A public opinion survey: is presumed consent the answer to kidney shortage in Hong Kong?
- Healthcare students support opt-out organ donation for practical and moral reasons
- Highlights from this issue
- Short-term impact of introducing a soft opt-out organ donation system in Wales: before and after study