Article info
PDFResponse
Large language models in medical ethics: useful but not expert
- Correspondence to Dr Andrea Ferrario, Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland; andrea.ferrario{at}ibme.uzh.ch
Citation
Large language models in medical ethics: useful but not expert
Publication history
- Received November 27, 2023
- Accepted January 10, 2024
- First published January 22, 2024.
Online issue publication
August 21, 2024
Article Versions
- Previous version (22 January 2024).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Improving quality in clinical placement studies in nursing homes (QUALinCLINstud): the study protocol of a participatory mixed-methods multiple case study design
- Development of critical thinking skills of undergraduate students throughout the 4 years of nursing degree at a public university in Spain: a descriptive study
- Critical thinking in healthcare and education
- Teaching strategies and outcome assessments targeting critical thinking in bachelor nursing students: a scoping review protocol
- Who is afraid of black box algorithms? On the epistemological and ethical basis of trust in medical AI
- Biodefence and the production of knowledge: rethinking the problem
- Undermining autonomy and consent: the transformative experience of disease
- Exploring the potential utility of AI large language models for medical ethics: an expert panel evaluation of GPT-4
- What information sources do Dutch medical specialists use in medical decision-making: a qualitative interview study
- Ethics by opinion poll? The functions of attitudes research for normative deliberations in medical ethics