Article Text
PDFCommentary
Machine learning for mental health diagnosis: tackling contributory injustice and epistemic oppression
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors GP and MDP contributed equally to the manuscript.
Funding MDP’s contribution to this work was supported by the H2020 European Research Council (grant number 949841).
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Testimonial injustice in medical machine learning
- Evidence, ethics and the promise of artificial intelligence in psychiatry
- Epistemic injustice in psychiatric practice: epistemic duties and the phenomenological approach
- Designing AI for mental health diagnosis: challenges from sub-Saharan African value-laden judgements on mental health disorders
- Epistemic injustice in healthcare encounters: evidence from chronic fatigue syndrome
- PDMP causes more than just testimonial injustice
- Are clinicians ethically obligated to disclose their use of medical machine learning systems to patients?
- Patients, clinicians and open notes: information blocking as a case of epistemic injustice
- Epistemic virtues of harnessing rigorous machine learning systems in ethically sensitive domains
- Negotiating cultural sensitivity in medical AI