Article info
PDFOriginal research
Revisiting the ought implies can dictum in light of disruptive medical innovation
- Correspondence to Michiel De Proost, Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium; michiel.deproost{at}ugent.be
Citation
Revisiting the ought implies can dictum in light of disruptive medical innovation
Publication history
- Received January 23, 2023
- Accepted August 27, 2023
- First published September 15, 2023.
Online issue publication
June 21, 2024
Article Versions
- Previous version (15 September 2023).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Focused ultrasound and metrics of diffusion of disruptive medical innovation
- Are disruptive innovations recognised in the healthcare literature? A systematic review
- Proton beam therapy: the next disruptive innovation in healthcare?
- On judgment and judgmentalism: how counselling can make people better
- Good medical ethics, from the inside out—and back again
- Killing people: what Kant could have said about suicide and euthanasia but did not
- The bioethical principles and Confucius’ moral philosophy
- A mobile revolution for healthcare? Setting the agenda for bioethics
- Defending the four principles approach as a good basis for good medical practice and therefore for good medical ethics
- Using Lean management to leverage innovation in healthcare projects: case study of a public hospital in the UAE