Article info
PDFResponse
Is ageing still undesirable? A reply to Räsänen
- Correspondence to Dr Pablo García-Barranquero, Department of Philosophy (Logic and Philosophy of Science), Universidad de Malaga, Malaga, Andalucía, Spain; pablogarcia{at}uma.es
Citation
Is ageing still undesirable? A reply to Räsänen
Publication history
- Received September 22, 2023
- Accepted September 29, 2023
- First published October 16, 2023.
Online issue publication
May 22, 2024
Article Versions
- Previous version (16 October 2023).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Is ageing undesirable? An ethical analysis
- Biology of premature ageing in survivors of cancer
- The developmental origins of ageing: study protocol for the Dutch famine birth cohort study on ageing
- Moral case for legal age change
- On Ageing and Maturing
- What is the ethics of ageing?
- Biological ageing and the risks of all-cause and cause-specific mortality among people with diabetes: a prospective cohort study
- The influence of epigenetic biological age on key complications and outcomes in aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage
- Life course socioeconomic position and DNA methylation age acceleration in mid-life
- Lung tissue gene-expression signature for the ageing lung in COPD