Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
We are extremely grateful for the insightful and thought-provoking commentaries on our feature article.1 We have distilled four themes emerging from the commentaries, and we would also like to address one misunderstanding of our argument that has appeared.
Microlevel as the entry point: clinical decision-making and climate protection
In our article, we explicitly acknowledge that major decisions relevant for climate protection take place at the mesolevels and macrolevels of healthcare, a point raised again in some of the commentaries.2–4 Climate protection is a societal issue, and we thank these authors for the concrete proposals of potential models to guide action. Yet, to us, it still makes sense to reflect simultaneously on the responsibilities that physicians have themselves. Without wanting to put the main responsibility on them, we argue it is important to start thinking about the scope of action that physicians actually have (or not have). As we have argued the need for climate action comes ever more into focus of society, we wanted to explore whether the professional ethics of the medical professionals needs to be amended.
Our argument is that this is the case, based on the reasons that climate change has a big health impact while simultaneously the health system has a strong climate impact. Based on the World Medical Association (WMA) Declaration of Geneva the focus on the individual patient is clear, but this and other important codices do also include a public health perspective. The (model) Professional Code for Physicians in Germany, for example, states in its first article that ‘Physicians serve the health of …
Footnotes
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Physicians’ duty to climate protection as an expression of their professional identity: a defence from Korsgaard’s neo-Kantian moral framework
- Climate change glossary for public health practice: from vulnerability to climate justice
- Navigating climate responsibility: a critical examination of healthcare professionals’ moral duties
- Focusing attention on physicians’ climate-related duties may risk missing the bigger picture: towards a systems approach to health and climate
- Health professionals in a changing climate: protocol for a scoping review
- Strengthening the global response to climate change and infectious disease threats
- Hospital climate actions and assessment tools: a scoping review protocol
- How should institutions help clinicians to practise greener anaesthesia: first-order and second-order responsibilities to practice sustainably
- A physician’s identity can never be reconfigured to put climate protection on par with an individual patient’s best interests
- Adolescent wellbeing and climate crisis: adolescents are responding, what about health professionals?