Article info
PDFResponse
The Pregnancy Rescue Case: a reply to Hendricks
- Correspondence to Nathan William Davies, Kenilworth, UK; nwd.correspondence{at}gmail.com
Citation
The Pregnancy Rescue Case: a reply to Hendricks
Publication history
- Received July 11, 2023
- Accepted August 4, 2023
- First published August 19, 2023.
Online issue publication
May 09, 2024
Article Versions
- Previous version (19 August 2023).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- The Pregnancy Rescue Case: why abortion is immoral
- Authority without identity: defending advance directives via posthumous rights over one’s body
- Why there is no dilemma for the birth strategy: a response to Bobier and Omelianchuk
- A future like ours revisited
- Hostile environments? Down’s syndrome and genetic screening in contemporary culture
- ‘A disastrous blow’: psychiatric risk, social indicators and medical authority in abortion reform in post-war Britain
- Infanticide and madness
- Twin pregnancy reduction is not an ‘all or nothing’ problem: a response to Räsänen
- Impairing the impairment argument
- Fetuses, newborns, & parental responsibility