Article Text
Response
The Pregnancy Rescue Case: a reply to Hendricks
Abstract
In ‘The Pregnancy Rescue Case: why abortion is immoral’, Hendricks presents The Pregnancy Rescue Case. In this reply I argue that even if it would be better (i.e., less bad) for the abortion to be prevented in The Pregnancy Rescue Case, that does not mean that typical abortions are impermissible. I also argue that there is a possible explanation, consistent with the pro-choice view and empirically testable, as to why people would think it better for the abortion to be prevented in The Pregnancy Rescue Case.
- Abortion - Induced
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Linked Articles
- Original research
- Response
- Response
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- The Pregnancy Rescue Case: why abortion is immoral
- Authority without identity: defending advance directives via posthumous rights over one’s body
- Why there is no dilemma for the birth strategy: a response to Bobier and Omelianchuk
- A future like ours revisited
- Hostile environments? Down’s syndrome and genetic screening in contemporary culture
- ‘A disastrous blow’: psychiatric risk, social indicators and medical authority in abortion reform in post-war Britain
- Infanticide and madness
- Twin pregnancy reduction is not an ‘all or nothing’ problem: a response to Räsänen
- Impairing the impairment argument
- Fetuses, newborns, & parental responsibility