Article info
Original research
Against tiebreaking arguments in priority setting
- Correspondence to Mr Borgar Jølstad, The Health Services Research Unit – HØKH, Akershus Universitetssykehus HF, Lorenskog, Norway; borgarjolstad{at}gmail.com
Citation
Against tiebreaking arguments in priority setting
Publication history
- Received February 3, 2023
- Accepted May 19, 2023
- First published June 8, 2023.
Online issue publication
May 09, 2024
Article Versions
- Previous version (8 June 2023).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Other content recommended for you
- Against proportional shortfall as a priority-setting principle
- Priority setting and personal health responsibility: an analysis of Norwegian key policy documents
- Do not despair about severity—yet
- Positing a difference between acts and omissions: the principle of justice, Rachels’ cases and moral weakness
- Contractualist reasoning, HIV cure clinical trials, and the moral (ir)relevance of the risk/benefit ratio
- The ethical canary: narrow reflective equilibrium as a source of moral justification in healthcare priority-setting
- On the relevance of personal responsibility in priority setting: a cross-sectional survey among Norwegian medical doctors
- Threats and offers in community mental healthcare
- Killing fetuses and killing newborns
- Abortion and the veil of ignorance: a response to Minehan