Article info
PDFFeature article
Artificial placentas, pregnancy loss and loss-sensitive care
- Correspondence to Dr Elizabeth Chloe Romanis, Centre for Ethics and Law in the Life Sciences, Durham Law School, Durham University, Durham, UK; elizabeth.c.romanis{at}durham.ac.uk
Citation
Artificial placentas, pregnancy loss and loss-sensitive care
Publication history
- Received July 5, 2023
- Accepted October 10, 2023
- First published November 6, 2023.
Online issue publication
May 09, 2024
Article Versions
- Previous version (6 November 2023).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Value sensitive design and the artificial placenta
- Pregnancy loss care should not be biased in favour of human gestation
- Pregnancy loss in the context of AAPT: speculation over substance?
- AAPT, pregnancy loss and planning ahead
- Conventional revolution: the ethical implications of the natural progress of neonatal intensive care to artificial wombs
- Reviewing the womb
- Overcoming (false) dichotomies to address ethical issues of artificial placentas
- Clinical challenges to the concept of ectogestation
- Mediation role of low birth weight on the factors associated with newborn mortality and the moderation role of institutional delivery in the association of low birth weight with newborn mortality in a resource-poor setting
- Diagnosis and management of first trimester miscarriage