Article info
PDFCurrent controversy
Lowering the age limit of access to the identity of the gamete donor by donor offspring: the argument against
- Correspondence to Dr Guido Pennings, Philosophy and Moral Science, Universiteit Gent, Gent, Belgium; guido.pennings{at}ugent.be
Citation
Lowering the age limit of access to the identity of the gamete donor by donor offspring: the argument against
Publication history
- Received January 19, 2023
- Accepted April 18, 2023
- First published May 2, 2023.
Online issue publication
May 09, 2024
Article Versions
- Previous version (2 May 2023).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Ethics briefings
- Thinking ethically about genetic inheritance: liberal rights, communitarianism and the right to privacy for parents of donor insemination children
- Mitochondrial donation and ‘the right to know’
- Britain’s new preimplantation tissue typing policy: an ethical defence
- Ethics briefings
- Ethics briefing
- Donor conceived children shouldn’t have right to be told of their origins, says Nuffield Council
- The rupture of anonymity for sperm donors—a tangled web of conflicting rights
- More than 100 sperm and egg donors prove ready to reveal identity to offspring
- Differences between sperm sharing and egg sharing are morally relevant