Article info
PDFResponse
Understanding genetic justice in the post-enhanced world: a reply to Sinead Prince
- Correspondence to Jon Rueda, Department of Philosophy 1, University of Granada, Granada, Granada, Spain; ruetxe{at}ugr.es
Citation
Understanding genetic justice in the post-enhanced world: a reply to Sinead Prince
Publication history
- Received September 7, 2023
- Accepted September 29, 2023
- First published October 16, 2023.
Online issue publication
March 20, 2024
Article Versions
- Previous version (20 March 2024).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Gene–environment interaction: why genetic enhancement might never be distributed fairly
- Genes and equality
- Whereto speculative bioethics? Technological visions and future simulations in a science fictional culture
- I'll be a monkey's uncle: a moral challenge to human genetic enhancement research
- The perils of failing to enhance: a response to Persson and Savulescu
- ‘My child will never initiate Ultimate Harm’: an argument against moral enhancement
- Reproductive technologies, risk, enhancement and the value of genetic relatedness
- Genetic enhancement, TED talks and the sense of wonder
- Genetic enhancements and expectations
- Possible people, complaints, and the distinction between genetic planning and genetic engineering