Responses
Other responses
Jump to comment:
- Published on: 20 March 2024
- Published on: 20 March 2024One cheer for trust
Eyal is correct that ethicists’ speculations about how the public may respond to human challenge trials are often made without a whisper of evidence.
This is not a new problem. The Institute of Medicine titled a 2001 monograph Preserving Public Trust: Accreditation and Human Research Participant Protection Programs. One might think that a book with this title would demonstrate that the IRB system preserves public trust, but the title is merely an ornamental flourish. The book is devoted entirely to the accreditation of IRBs; public trust is neither analyzed in depth nor is there any attempt to show that accreditation improves trust.
We all agree that trust is important, which is what earns it one cheer. Assertions about its future trajectory merit additional applause only when they are are supported by evidence.
Cite: Institute of Medicine (U.S.). Committee on Assessing the System for Protecting Human Research Subjects. 2001. Preserving Public Trust: Accreditation and Human Research Participant Protection Programs. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Conflict of Interest:
None declared.
Other content recommended for you
- COVID-19 controlled human infection studies: worries about local community impact and demands for local engagement
- Vaccine confidence, public understanding and probity: time for a shift in focus?
- Do coronavirus vaccine challenge trials have a distinctive generalisability problem?
- Using social media to build confidence in vaccines: lessons from community engagement and social science research in Africa
- Understanding attitudes and beliefs regarding COVID-19 vaccines among transitional-aged youth with mental health concerns: a youth-led qualitative study
- Acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines in Palestine: a cross-sectional online study
- Public acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines: cross-national evidence on levels and individual-level predictors using observational data
- Building public trust in preparation for future health shocks: a research agenda
- Correlates of intended COVID-19 vaccine acceptance across time and countries: results from a series of cross-sectional surveys
- Confronting ‘chaos’: a qualitative study assessing public health officials’ perceptions of the factors affecting Tanzania’s COVID-19 vaccine rollout