Article info
PDFFeature article
What makes a medical intervention invasive?
- Correspondence to Dr Thomas Douglas, Faculty of Philosophy, Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; thomas.douglas{at}philosophy.ox.ac.uk
Citation
What makes a medical intervention invasive?
Publication history
- Received May 26, 2023
- Accepted August 27, 2023
- First published September 18, 2023.
Online issue publication
March 20, 2024
Article Versions
- Previous version (20 March 2024).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Incision or insertion makes a medical intervention invasive. Commentary on ‘What makes a medical intervention invasive?’
- Non-invasive brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature
- Mainstreaming genetics into Italian prenatal care: exploring the future implementation of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in the Italian National Healthcare System using stakeholder interviews
- Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis: progress and potential
- Therapeutic non-invasive brain stimulation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: rationale, methods and experience
- Introducing the non-invasive prenatal testing for detection of Down syndrome in China: a cost-effectiveness analysis
- Uptake, outcomes, and costs of implementing non-invasive prenatal testing for Down’s syndrome into NHS maternity care: prospective cohort study in eight diverse maternity units
- Non-invasive prenatal testing in mitigating concerns from invasive prenatal diagnostic testing: retrospective assessment of utility in an academic healthcare system in the US
- Introducing the non-invasive prenatal test for trisomy 21 in Belgium: a cost-consequences analysis
- ‘Is it better not to know certain things?’: views of women who have undergone non-invasive prenatal testing on its possible future applications