Article Text
Current controversy
Reassessing the VaxTax
Abstract
To counter the imbalance in vaccine distribution during the COVID-19 pandemic, Albertsen and more recently Germani et al have suggested a new system of taxation coined as ‘VaxTax’ that would force higher-income countries to fund the access of low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) to new vaccines in times of pandemic. I will argue that this idea faces numerous challenges of ethical, sociopolitical and economical nature that may hinder any effort to solve the numerous health challenges that LMICs face. I argue that while it is an interesting idea, it is neither sufficient nor will it ever be easily implemented because of socioeconomic or practical reasons.
- Policy
- Public Policy
- Paternalism
- Legislation
Data availability statement
There are no data in this work.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Vaccine equity in COVID-19: a meta-narrative review
- It is not too late to achieve global covid-19 vaccine equity
- Global access to COVID-19 vaccines: a scoping review of factors that may influence equitable access for low and middle-income countries
- ‘VaxTax’: a follow-up proposal for a global vaccine pandemic response fund
- Reserving coronavirus disease 2019 vaccines for global access: cross sectional analysis
- Covax must go beyond proportional allocation of covid vaccines to ensure fair and equitable access
- Analysis of the institutional landscape and proliferation of proposals for global vaccine equity for COVID-19: too many cooks or too many recipes?
- Vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostics for covid-19: redesigning systems to improve pandemic response
- Incentivising wealthy nations to participate in the COVID-19 Vaccine Global Access Facility (COVAX): a game theory perspective
- Why are vaccination rates lower in low and middle income countries, and what can we do about it?