Article Text
PDFCommentary
ICoME and the legitimacy of professional self-regulation
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
AM and EGS contributed equally.
Contributors The authors contributed equally to the inception and writing of this commentary. The arguments presented in this work were developed together by both Mr. Mansoori and Mr. Schantz. The intial draft of this work was written by Mr. Mansoori, and subsequently revised by Mr. Schantz.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- The revised International Code of Medical Ethics: an exercise in international professional ethical self-regulation
- Gaps, conflicts, and consensus in the ethics statements of professional associations, medical groups, and health plans
- Towards a European code of medical ethics. Ethical and legal issues
- Physician moral injury in the context of moral, ethical and legal codes
- The revised International Code of Medical Ethics unites doctors under one global medical ethos
- Physicians’ duty to climate protection as an expression of their professional identity: a defence from Korsgaard’s neo-Kantian moral framework
- The production of medicoethical misconduct: medical ethics and vivisection in Wilkie Collins’s Heart and Science
- The revised International Code of Medical Ethics: responses to some important questions
- Taking a moral holiday? Physicians’ practical identities at the margins of professional ethics
- Dear WMA, please better engage LMICs and say more about environmental sustainability