Article info

Consent-GPT: is it ethical to delegate procedural consent to conversational AI?

Authors

  • Jemima Winifred Allen Faculty of Medicine, Nursing & Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, AustraliaOxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Brian D Earp Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Julian Koplin Monash Bioethics Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Dominic Wilkinson Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford, Oxford, UKNewborn Care, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UKCentre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, SingaporeMurdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  1. Correspondence to Dominic Wilkinson; dominic.wilkinson{at}philosophy.ox.ac.uk
View Full Text

Citation

Allen JW, Earp BD, Koplin J, et al
Consent-GPT: is it ethical to delegate procedural consent to conversational AI?

Publication history

  • Received June 19, 2023
  • Accepted September 3, 2023
  • First published October 28, 2023.
Online issue publication 
January 23, 2024
  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.