Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
In his feature article, Tyler Paetkau1 argues that the Nuffield Council on Bioethics’ (NCOB) infamous intervention ladder2 fails to acknowledge systemic influences towards poor health outcomes and instead places the blame on individuals. The ladder of interventions to change individual health behaviours runs from less intrusive to more intrusive and pays less attention to possible regulatory mechanisms for big businesses that would often avoid such intrusion on individuals and the punitive implications of that intrusion. Paetkau cites smoking bans and food labelling as examples of various levels of public health measures intruding on individual freedoms. According to him, instead of preventing people from smoking in public spaces or trying to influence their food purchase decisions, we should instead address the social determinants of health through systemic interventions, by which he means ‘interventions that operate on the level of systems rather than individuals and do not target or require individual behaviour change’1 (p. 2).
The argument, however, might be questioned. At points in the article, Paetkau proposes that his new, broadened ‘stairway’ set of public health interventions ‘highlights the intimate connection between systemic interventions and individual outcomes’1 (p. 5). However, in some places, …
Footnotes
X @drtessjohnson
Contributors TJ is the sole author of this work.
Funding This work was funded by the Wellcome Trust (221719).
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Ladders and stairs: how the intervention ladder focuses blame on individuals and obscures systemic failings and interventions
- Non-cigarette tobacco products: what have we learnt and where are we headed?
- Seeking out ‘easy targets’? Tobacco companies, health inequalities and public policy
- Investing in youth tobacco control: a review of smoking prevention and control strategies
- Students’ perceptions of a university ‘No Smoking’ policy and barriers to implementation: a cross- sectional study
- Double standards and arguments for tobacco regulation
- The WHO-INTEGRATE evidence to decision framework version 1.0: integrating WHO norms and values and a complexity perspective
- Leaders’ and followers’ individual experiences during the early phase of simulation-based team training: an exploratory study
- The social context of smoking: the next frontier in tobacco control?
- Public health measures to reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in Canada during the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review