Article info
PDFExtended essay
Mental integrity, autonomy, and fundamental interests
- Correspondence to Dr Peter Zuk; Peter_Zuk{at}hms.harvard.edu
Citation
Mental integrity, autonomy, and fundamental interests
Publication history
- Received November 23, 2023
- Accepted April 25, 2024
- First published August 13, 2024.
Online issue publication
September 20, 2024
Article Versions
- Previous version (13 August 2024).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- A healthcare approach to mental integrity
- Neurointerventions and informed consent
- Non-voluntary BCI explantation: assessing possible neurorights violations in light of contrasting mental ontologies
- Neurorights in question: rethinking the concept of mental integrity
- Ethical examination of deep brain stimulation’s ‘last resort’ status
- Right to mental integrity and neurotechnologies: implications of the extended mind thesis
- Authenticity or autonomy? When deep brain stimulation causes a dilemma
- No going back? Reversibility and why it matters for deep brain stimulation
- Authenticity and autonomy in deep-brain stimulation
- Paediatric deep brain stimulation: ethical considerations in malignant Tourette syndrome