Article info
Response
Trusted research environments are definitely about trust
- Correspondence to Mr Paul Affleck, University of Leeds Faculty of Medicine and Health, Leeds, UK; p.a.affleck{at}leeds.ac.uk
Citation
Trusted research environments are definitely about trust
Publication history
- Received September 30, 2022
- Accepted October 18, 2022
- First published November 2, 2022.
Online issue publication
August 30, 2023
Article Versions
- Previous version (2 November 2022).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Trust and the Goldacre Review: why trusted research environments are not about trust
- TREs are still not about trust
- Verification and trust in healthcare
- Linked electronic health records for research on a nationwide cohort of more than 54 million people in England: data resource
- Machine learning models, trusted research environments and UK health data: ensuring a safe and beneficial future for AI development in healthcare
- Infrastructure and operating processes of PIONEER, the HDR-UK Data Hub in Acute Care and the workings of the Data Trust Committee: a protocol paper
- Evaluation protocol of the implementation of a learning healthcare system in clinical practice: the Connected Health Cities programme in the north of England
- Can the NHS successfully deliver its GP data extraction scheme?
- Consent and the ethical duty to participate in health data research
- Ethics briefing