Article Text
Response
Trusted research environments are definitely about trust
Abstract
In their highly topical paper, Graham et al argued that Trusted Research Environments (TREs) are not actually about trust because they reduce or remove ‘…the need for trust in the use and sharing of patient health data’. We believe this is fundamentally mistaken. TREs mitigate or remove some risks, but they do not address all public concerns. In this regard, TREs provide evidence for people to decide whether the bodies holding and using their data can be trusted. TREs may make it easier for people to trust but there is still a need for that trust.
- Ethics- Research
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Trust and the Goldacre Review: why trusted research environments are not about trust
- TREs are still not about trust
- Verification and trust in healthcare
- Linked electronic health records for research on a nationwide cohort of more than 54 million people in England: data resource
- Machine learning models, trusted research environments and UK health data: ensuring a safe and beneficial future for AI development in healthcare
- Infrastructure and operating processes of PIONEER, the HDR-UK Data Hub in Acute Care and the workings of the Data Trust Committee: a protocol paper
- Evaluation protocol of the implementation of a learning healthcare system in clinical practice: the Connected Health Cities programme in the north of England
- Can the NHS successfully deliver its GP data extraction scheme?
- Consent and the ethical duty to participate in health data research
- Ethics briefing