Article Text
PDFCommentary
Informed decision-making in labour: action required
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
- Feature article
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Upright versus lying down position in second stage of labour in nulliparous women with low dose epidural: BUMPES randomised controlled trial
- Midline episiotomy and anal incontinence: retrospective cohort study
- Knowledge, attitude and experience of episiotomy practice among obstetricians and midwives: a cross-sectional study from China
- Has the medicalisation of childbirth gone too far?
- Lateral episiotomy versus no episiotomy to reduce obstetric anal sphincter injury in vacuum-assisted delivery in nulliparous women: study protocol on a randomised controlled trial
- The ethics of consent during labour and birth: episiotomies
- Why some women who attend focused antenatal care fail to deliver in health facilities: a qualitative study of women’s perspectives from slums of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
- Strategies to reduce the caesarean section rate in a private hospital and their impact
- Understanding the perspectives and values of midwives, obstetricians and obstetric registrars regarding episiotomy: qualitative interview study
- Promoting compassionate and respectful maternity care during facility-based delivery in Ethiopia: perspectives of clients and midwives