Article info
PDFOriginal research
Human equality arguments against abortion
- Correspondence to Dr Calum Miller, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3LN, UK; c.miller{at}oxon.org
Citation
Human equality arguments against abortion
Publication history
- Received August 7, 2022
- Accepted October 30, 2022
- First published November 16, 2022.
Online issue publication
February 23, 2024
Article Versions
- Previous version (23 February 2024).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Subhumans, human flourishing and abortion: a reply to Räsänen
- Abortion and the basis of equality: a reply to Miller
- Fetuses are not adult humans: a response to Miller on abortion
- Of course the baby should live: against ‘after-birth abortion’
- A Moorean argument for the full moral status of those with profound intellectual disability
- Is there a ‘new ethics of abortion’?
- Philosophy, critical thinking and ‘after-birth abortion: why should the baby live?’
- Egalitarianism, moral status and abortion: a reply to Miller
- What moral status should be accorded to those human beings who have profound intellectual disabilities? A reply to Curtis and Vehmas
- Personhood, harm and interest: a reply to Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva