Article info
PDFCommentary
Ubuntu as a complementary perspective for addressing epistemic (in)justice in medical machine learning
- Correspondence to Brandon Ferlito, Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; brandon.ferlito{at}ugent.be
Citation
Ubuntu as a complementary perspective for addressing epistemic (in)justice in medical machine learning
Publication history
- Received March 13, 2023
- Accepted May 4, 2023
- First published May 15, 2023.
Online issue publication
July 24, 2023
Article Versions
- Previous version (15 May 2023).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Where is knowledge from the global South? An account of epistemic justice for a global bioethics
- How to identify epistemic injustice in global health research funding practices: a decolonial guide
- Epistemic injustice, children and mental illness
- Epistemic injustice in healthcare encounters: evidence from chronic fatigue syndrome
- Epistemic injustice in psychiatric practice: epistemic duties and the phenomenological approach
- Epistemic repair in global health: a human rights approach towards epistemic justice
- Knowledge from the global South is in the global South
- Evidence, ethics and the promise of artificial intelligence in psychiatry
- What type of inclusion does epistemic injustice require?
- Patients, clinicians and open notes: information blocking as a case of epistemic injustice