Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Leveling (down) the playing field: performance diminishments and fairness in sport
  1. Sebastian Jon Holmen,
  2. Thomas Søbirk Petersen,
  3. Jesper Ryberg
  1. Philosophy and Science Studies, Department of Communication and Arts, Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark
  1. Correspondence to Dr Thomas Søbirk Petersen, Department of Communication and Arts, Roskilde University, Roskilde 4000, Denmark; thomassp{at}ruc.dk

Abstract

The 2018 eligibility regulation for female competitors with differences of sexual development (DSD) issued by World Athletics requires competitors with DSD with blood testosterone levels at or above 5 nmol/L and sufficient androgen sensitivity to be excluded from competition in certain events unless they reduce the level of testosterone in their blood. This paper formalises and then critically assesses the fairness-based argument offered in support of this regulation by the federation. It argues that it is unclear how the biological advantage singled out by the regulation as an appropriate target for diminishment, is relevantly different from other biological advantages that athletes may enjoy, and specifically that Sigmund Loland’s recent attempt to drive a wedge between heightened levels of blood testosterone and other biological advantages fails. The paper also suggests that even if heightened blood testosterone levels do differ relevantly from other types of biological advantage, the regulation is further challenged by studies indicating that athletes with blood testosterone at the high end of the normal range have a competitive advantage over athletes with blood testosterone levels at the low end of it. Finally, the paper contends that the premises of the fairness-based argument do not unequivocally support the conclusion that DSD athletes with heightened levels of testosterone should diminish those levels, since, just as powerfully, they support allowing athletes with normal levels of testosterone to use performance-enhancing drugs in the name of fairness.

  • biomedical enhancement
  • enhancement
  • ethics
  • minority groups

Data availability statement

Data sharing not applicable as no datasets generated and/or analysed for this study.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

Data sharing not applicable as no datasets generated and/or analysed for this study.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Twitter @EthicsThSoebirk

  • Correction notice Since this paper first published, an acknowledgement statement has been added.

  • Funding This study was supported by Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond (7023-00018B).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.