Article Text
PDFCommentary
What should recognition entail? Responding to the reification of autonomy and vulnerability in medical research
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors JL drafted the commentary. JL and SH contributed equally to its revision. JL and SH both approved the final version for submission.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
↵For Honneth, recognition that manifests in love/friendship, and the self-trust it supports, is predominantly an object of intimate relationships. Thus, it is not considered here.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Capturing and promoting the autonomy of capacitous vulnerable adults
- Ideals of patient autonomy in clinical decision making: a study on the development of a scale to assess patients’ and physicians’ views
- Developing an ethics framework for living donor transplantation
- Autonomy in medical ethics after O’Neill
- The ethics of imperfect cures: models of service delivery and patient vulnerability
- Is respect for autonomy defensible?
- Applicability of the principle of respect for autonomy: the perspective of Turkey
- Egg freezing for non-medical uses: the lack of a relational approach to autonomy in the new Israeli policy and in academic discussion
- The secret art of managing healthcare expenses: investigating implicit rationing and autonomy in public healthcare systems
- Forced to be free? Increasing patient autonomy by constraining it