Responses
Current controversy
Preserving women’s reproductive autonomy while promoting the rights of people with disabilities?: the case of Heidi Crowter and Maire Lea-Wilson in the light of NIPT debates in England, France and Germany
Compose a Response to This Article
Other responses
No responses have been published for this article.
Other content recommended for you
- Ethics of routine: a critical analysis of the concept of ‘routinisation’ in prenatal screening
- Accuracy of non-invasive prenatal testing using cell-free DNA for detection of Down, Edwards and Patau syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Hostile environments? Down’s syndrome and genetic screening in contemporary culture
- ‘Is it better not to know certain things?’: views of women who have undergone non-invasive prenatal testing on its possible future applications
- Mainstreaming genetics into Italian prenatal care: exploring the future implementation of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in the Italian National Healthcare System using stakeholder interviews
- Introducing the non-invasive prenatal testing for detection of Down syndrome in China: a cost-effectiveness analysis
- Uptake, outcomes, and costs of implementing non-invasive prenatal testing for Down’s syndrome into NHS maternity care: prospective cohort study in eight diverse maternity units
- Should pregnant women be charged for non-invasive prenatal screening? Implications for reproductive autonomy and equal access
- Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis: progress and potential
- Introducing the non-invasive prenatal test for trisomy 21 in Belgium: a cost-consequences analysis