Article info
Original research
Regulating abortion after ectogestation
- Correspondence to Dr Joona Räsänen, CEPDISC - Centre for the Experimental-Philosophical Study of Discrimination, Department of Political Science, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Midtjylland, Denmark; joona.rasanen{at}ps.au.dk
Citation
Regulating abortion after ectogestation
Publication history
- Received January 24, 2022
- Accepted June 8, 2022
- First published June 20, 2022.
Online issue publication
May 22, 2023
Article Versions
- Previous version (20 June 2022).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Reviewing the womb
- Impact of ectogenesis on the medicalisation of pregnancy and childbirth
- Artificial womb technology and the frontiers of human reproduction: conceptual differences and potential implications
- Abortion and Ectogenesis: Moral Compromise
- Conventional revolution: the ethical implications of the natural progress of neonatal intensive care to artificial wombs
- Subjects of ectogenesis: are ‘gestatelings’ fetuses, newborns or neither?
- Artificial wombs, birth and ‘birth’: a response to Romanis
- Willing mothers: ectogenesis and the role of gestational motherhood
- The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008: a missed opportunity?
- Artificial womb technology and the significance of birth: why gestatelings are not newborns (or fetuses)