Article info
Response
Epistemic injustice, children and mental illness: reply to comments
- Correspondence to Professor Edward Harcourt, Philosophy, University of Oxford Humanities Division, Oxford, UK; edward.harcourt{at}philosophy.ox.ac.uk
Citation
Epistemic injustice, children and mental illness: reply to comments
Publication history
- Received January 31, 2022
- Accepted February 7, 2022
- First published February 24, 2022.
Online issue publication
March 23, 2023
Article Versions
- Previous version (24 February 2022).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Epistemic injustice, children and mental illness
- Epistemic injustice in psychiatric practice: epistemic duties and the phenomenological approach
- Epistemic injustice in healthcare encounters: evidence from chronic fatigue syndrome
- Patients, clinicians and open notes: information blocking as a case of epistemic injustice
- Where is knowledge from the global South? An account of epistemic justice for a global bioethics
- Evidence, ethics and the promise of artificial intelligence in psychiatry
- From hermeneutics to heteroglossia: ‘The Patient’s View’ revisited
- Epistemic repair in global health: a human rights approach towards epistemic justice
- How to identify epistemic injustice in global health research funding practices: a decolonial guide
- Look for injustice and you’ll probably find it: a commentary on Harcourt’s ‘epistemic injustice, children and mental illness’