Article Text
Commentary
Expanding choice at the end of life
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Twitter @Neonatalethics
Funding This research was funded in whole, or in part, by the Wellcome Trust (203132/Z/16/Z).
Disclaimer The funders had no role in the preparation of this manuscript or the decision to submit for publication. For the purpose of open access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Expanded terminal sedation in end-of-life care
- Withdrawal of artificial nutrition and hydration in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: parental perspectives
- Withdrawing artificial nutrition and hydration from minimally conscious and vegetative patients: family perspectives
- A matter of life and death: controversy at the interface between clinical and legal decision-making in prolonged disorders of consciousness
- Palliative sedation: not just normal medical practice. Ethical reflections on the Royal Dutch Medical Association's guideline on palliative sedation
- Continuous palliative sedation in terminally ill patients with cancer: a retrospective observational cohort study from a Chinese palliative care unit
- A matter of life and death
- Causes and consequences of delays in treatment-withdrawal from PVS patients: a case study of Cumbria NHS Clinical Commissioning Group v Miss S and Ors [2016] EWCOP 32
- Withdrawing life-sustaining treatment: a stock-take of the legal and ethical position
- Ethical challenges in palliative sedation of adults: protocol for a systematic review of current clinical practice guidelines