Article info
PDFResponse
The Patient preference predictor and the objection from higher-order preferences
- Correspondence to Dr Jakob Thrane Mainz, Aarhus Universitet, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark; jtm{at}cas.au.dk
Citation
The Patient preference predictor and the objection from higher-order preferences
Publication history
- Received May 19, 2022
- Accepted June 24, 2022
- First published July 1, 2022.
Online issue publication
February 21, 2023
Article Versions
- Previous version (1 July 2022).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Autonomy-based criticisms of the patient preference predictor
- In the patient’s best interest: appraising social network site information for surrogate decision making
- First among equals? Adaptive preferences and the limits of autonomy in medical ethics
- Response to commentaries: ‘autonomy-based criticisms of the patient preference predictor’
- Clarifying substituted judgement: the endorsed life approach
- Withholding and withdrawing life support in critical care settings: ethical issues concerning consent
- Physicians’s reports on the impact of living wills at the end of life in Japan
- Ethical issues of resuscitation: an American perspective
- Decision-making in palliative care: patient and family caregiver concordance and discordance—systematic review and narrative synthesis
- Life-prolonging treatment in nursing homes: how do physicians and nurses describe and justify their own practice?