Article Text
PDFCommentary
Artificial Intelligence algorithms cannot recommend a best interests decision but could help by improving prognostication
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Twitter @derickwaderehab
Correction notice Since first publication, the title of this commentary has been updated.
Contributors This is my own work and there are no other authors.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Public perceptions on the application of artificial intelligence in healthcare: a qualitative meta-synthesis
- Use of artificial intelligence for image analysis in breast cancer screening programmes: systematic review of test accuracy
- Glaucoma management in the era of artificial intelligence
- Ethics of the algorithmic prediction of goal of care preferences: from theory to practice
- Human factors challenges for the safe use of artificial intelligence in patient care
- Artificial intelligence (AI) and global health: how can AI contribute to health in resource-poor settings?
- Improving Skin cancer Management with ARTificial Intelligence (SMARTI): protocol for a preintervention/postintervention trial of an artificial intelligence system used as a diagnostic aid for skin cancer management in a specialist dermatology setting
- AI-enabled suicide prediction tools: ethical considerations for medical leaders
- AI support for ethical decision-making around resuscitation: proceed with care
- Systematic review protocol to assess artificial intelligence diagnostic accuracy performance in detecting acute ischaemic stroke and large-vessel occlusions on CT and MR medical imaging