Article Text
Abstract
Patient portals are poised to transform health communication by empowering patients with rapid access to their own health data. The 21st Century Cures Act is a US federal law that, among other provisions, prevents health entities from engaging in practices that disrupt the exchange of electronic health information—a measure that may increase the usage of patient health portals. Caregiver access to patient portals, however, may lead to breaches in patient privacy and confidentiality if not managed properly through proxy accounts. We present an ethical framework that guides policy and clinical workflow development for healthcare institutions to support the best use of patient portals. Caregivers are vital members of the care team and should be supported through novel forms of health information technology (IT). Patients, however, may not want all information to be shared with their proxies so healthcare institutions must support the development and use of separate proxy accounts as opposed to using the patient’s own account as well provide controls for limiting the scope of information displayed in the proxy accounts. Lastly, as socioeconomic barriers to adoption of health IT persist, healthcare providers must work to ensure multiple streams of patient communication, to prevent further propagating health inequities.
- Confidentiality
- Ethics- Medical
- Information Technology
- Policy
Data availability statement
Data sharing not applicable as no datasets generated and/or analysed for this study. Not applicable.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Data availability statement
Data sharing not applicable as no datasets generated and/or analysed for this study. Not applicable.
Footnotes
Twitter @nickgenes
Contributors TG and NG conceived of the presented idea. TG wrote the manuscript with support from NG and JMA, NG and JMA supervised the project and findings from this work. TG, NG, and JMA accept full responsibility for this work and conduct of this study.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Engaging patients through an iBooks-based patient portal tutorial
- Improving patient portal enrolment in an academic resident continuity clinic: quality improvement made simple
- Synthesising evidence on patient portals: a protocol for an umbrella review
- Open notes in patient care: confining deceptive placebos to the past?
- Behavioral interventions to improve population health outreach for hepatitis C screening: randomized clinical trial
- Cross-sectional analyses of online appointment booking and repeat prescription ordering user characteristics in general practices of England in the years 2018–2020
- Mixed-methods study examining family carers’ perceptions of the relationship between intrahospital transitions and patient readiness for discharge
- Patient-generated health data and electronic health record integration: protocol for a scoping review
- Sharing online clinical notes with patients: implications for nocebo effects and health equity
- Patients, clinicians and open notes: information blocking as a case of epistemic injustice