Article info
PDFResponse
My body, still my choice: an objection to Hendricks on abortion
- Correspondence to Kyle van Oosterum, Faculty of Philosophy, Oxford University, Oxford, UK; kyle.vanoosterum{at}philosophy.ox.ac.uk
Citation
My body, still my choice: an objection to Hendricks on abortion
Publication history
- Received July 14, 2022
- Accepted July 22, 2022
- First published July 29, 2022.
Online issue publication
January 24, 2023
Article Versions
- Previous version (29 July 2022).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- My body, not my choice: against legalised abortion
- Advertisements of follow-on formula and their perception by pregnant women and mothers in Italy
- Ethics briefings
- Critical notice—Defending life: a moral and legal case against abortion choice by Francis J Beckwith
- Henry Morgentaler: model for the UK?
- Circumventing the WHO Code? An observational study
- Authority without identity: defending advance directives via posthumous rights over one’s body
- Reviewing the womb
- Why there is no dilemma for the birth strategy: a response to Bobier and Omelianchuk
- Systematic review of infant and young child feeding practices in conflict areas: what the evidence advocates