Article info
PDFOriginal research
Clinical challenges to the concept of ectogestation
- Correspondence to Phillip S Wozniak, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; phillip.wozniak{at}osumc.edu
Citation
Clinical challenges to the concept of ectogestation
Publication history
- Received September 21, 2021
- Accepted January 30, 2022
- First published February 10, 2022.
Online issue publication
January 24, 2023
Article Versions
- Previous version (10 February 2022).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Premature infant with sudden respiratory distress
- A misplaced peripherally inserted central catheter presenting as contralateral pleural effusion
- Conventional revolution: the ethical implications of the natural progress of neonatal intensive care to artificial wombs
- 2% chlorhexidine–70% isopropyl alcohol versus 10% povidone–iodine for insertion site cleaning before central line insertion in preterm infants: a randomised trial
- Umbilical venous catheterisation: emergency central venous access which saves lives in coarctation of the aorta
- Advantages of being diligent: lessons learnt from umbilical venous catheterisation in neonates
- CLABSI reduction using evidence based interventions and nurse empowerment: a quality improvement initiative from a tertiary care NICU in Pakistan
- Fifteen-minute consultation: Decision-making pathway for neonatal vascular access
- Gestaticide: killing the subject of the artificial womb
- Peripherally inserted central catheters versus non-tunnelled ultrasound-guided central venous catheters in newborns: a retrospective observational study