Drawing on the principle of subsidiarity, this article develops a framework for allocating medical decision-making authority in the absence of capacity to consent and argues that decisional authority in paediatric transgender healthcare should generally lie in the patient. Regardless of patients’ capacity, there is usually nobody better positioned to make medical decisions that go to the heart of a patient’s identity than the patients themselves. Under the principle of subsidiarity, decisional authority should only be held by a higher level decision-maker, such as parents or judges, if lower level decision-makers are incapable of satisfactorily addressing the issue even with support and the higher level decision-maker is better positioned to satisfactorily address the issue than all lower level decision-makers. Because gender uniquely pertains to personal identity and self-realisation, parents and judges are rarely better positioned to make complex medical decisions. Instead of taking away trans youth’s authority over their healthcare decisions, we should focus on supporting their ability to take the best possible decision for themselves.
- gender identity
- informed consent
- decision making
Data availability statement
Data sharing not applicable as no data sets generated and/or analysed for this study.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Medically assisted gender affirmation: when children and parents disagree
- Flawed reasoning on two dilemmas: a commentary on Baron and Dierckxsens (2021)
- Gender dysphoria in young people is rising—and so is professional disagreement
- Gender-affirming care in undergraduate nursing education: a scoping review protocol
- Fertility preservation for transgender children and young people in paediatric healthcare: a systematic review of ethical considerations
- High court should not restrict access to puberty blockers for minors
- To be, or not to be? The role of the unconscious in transgender transitioning: identity, autonomy and well-being
- Forever young? The ethics of ongoing puberty suppression for non-binary adults
- What are the health outcomes of trans and gender diverse young people in Australia? Study protocol for the Trans20 longitudinal cohort study
- Two dilemmas for medical ethics in the treatment of gender dysphoria in youth