Article info
Response
Deception in medicine: acupuncturist cases
- Correspondence to Dr William Simkulet, Philosophy, Park University, Parkville, MO 64152, USA; simkuletwm{at}yahoo.com
Citation
Deception in medicine: acupuncturist cases
Publication history
- Received December 28, 2022
- Accepted January 6, 2023
- First published January 24, 2023.
Online issue publication
November 28, 2023
Article Versions
- Previous version (28 November 2023).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Deception, intention and clinical practice
- Pretending to care
- Nudging, informed consent and bullshit
- At odds with the truth
- Truthful nudging
- Evidence on acupuncture therapies is underused in clinical practice and health policy
- Management of chronic pain using complementary and integrative medicine
- Acupuncture
- Acupuncture treatment for pain: systematic review of randomised clinical trials with acupuncture, placebo acupuncture, and no acupuncture groups
- Parsing placebo treatments: a response to Barnhill and Miller