Article info
PDFResponse
Why there is no dilemma for the birth strategy: a response to Bobier and Omelianchuk
- Correspondence to Prabhpal Singh, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada; psing134{at}uottawa.ca
Citation
Why there is no dilemma for the birth strategy: a response to Bobier and Omelianchuk
Publication history
- Received November 24, 2022
- Accepted December 22, 2022
- First published December 30, 2022.
Online issue publication
October 23, 2023
Article Versions
- Previous version (30 December 2022).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Dilemma for appeals to the moral significance of birth
- Birth, meaningful viability and abortion
- Is current practice around late termination of pregnancy eugenic and discriminatory? Maternal interests and abortion
- Fetuses, newborns, & parental responsibility
- Authority without identity: defending advance directives via posthumous rights over one’s body
- The pearl of the ‘Pro-Life’ movement? Reflections on the Kermit Gosnell controversy
- Thomson, the right to life, and partial birth abortion or two MULES* for Sister Sarah
- The common premise for uncommon conclusions
- Avoiding anomalous newborns: preemptive abortion, treatment thresholds and the case of baby Messenger
- Reproductive autonomy and the ethics of abortion