Article Text
Abstract
A growing body of cross-cultural survey research shows high percentages of clinicians report using placebos in clinical settings. One motivation for clinicians using placebos is to help patients by capitalising on the placebo effect’s reported health benefits. This is not surprising, given that placebo studies are burgeoning, with increasing calls by researchers to ethically harness placebo effects among patients. These calls propose placebos/placebo effects offer clinically significant benefits to patients. In this paper, we argue many findings in this highly cited and ‘hot’ field have not been independently replicated. Evaluating the ethicality of placebo use in clinical practice involves first understanding whether placebos are efficacious clinically. Therefore, it is crucial to consider placebo research in the context of the replication crisis and what can be learnt to advance evidence-based knowledge of placebos/placebo effects and their clinical relevance (or lack thereof). In doing so, our goal in this paper is to motivate both increased awareness of replication issues and to help pave the way for advances in scientific research in the field of placebo studies to better inform ethical evidence-based practice. We argue that, only by developing a rigorous evidence base can we better understand how, if at all, placebos/placebo effects can be harnessed ethically in clinical settings.
- Ethics- Medical
- Informed Consent
- Personal Autonomy
- Philosophy- Medical
- Primary Health Care
Data availability statement
No data are available. Not applicable.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Data availability statement
No data are available. Not applicable.
Footnotes
Contributors CB, BC and CL developed the concept for the paper, discussed and identified content to be included. CB wrote the first draft with BC and CL significantly contributing to content. All authors revised and approved the final version of the manuscript. CB is the guarantor of the article.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Placebo and nocebo effects and mechanisms associated with pharmacological interventions: an umbrella review
- Placebos in chronic pain: evidence, theory, ethics, and use in clinical practice
- Neurofeedback as placebo: a case of unintentional deception?
- Placebo effects and the molecular biological components involved
- More than consent for ethical open-label placebo research
- Placebo effects and racial and ethnic health disparities: an unjust and underexplored connection
- Randomised placebo-controlled trials of surgery: ethical analysis and guidelines
- Physician perspectives on placebo ethics
- Open notes in patient care: confining deceptive placebos to the past?
- Placebo: the lie that comes true?