Michael Robinson takes issue with an ‘argument from voluntariness’ made by several opponents of current practices for managing conscientious objection (CO) in healthcare, including Cantor, Stahl and Emanuel, and Schuklenk, whom he characterises as ‘non-accommodationists’. Here I argue that while Robinson is right to oppose the argument from voluntariness, he misunderstands current arrangements for managing CO in healthcare, and he misses the force of the non-accommodationist case against those arrangements. I also argue that despite what he says, Robinson is as much a proponent of reform of the management of CO in healthcare as are his non-accommodationist opponents. Additionally, I raise a concern about Robinson’s preferred approach to managing CO in healthcare.
- Conscientious Refusal to Treat
- Ethics- Medical
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Contributors This work has been produced by SC without help from other contributors.
Funding This study was funded by Australian Research Council (DP190101597).
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Voluntarily chosen roles and conscientious objection in health care
- Conscientious objection in healthcare: new directions
- Conscientious objection in healthcare, referral and the military analogy
- Conscientious objection in healthcare: why tribunals might be the answer
- Conscientious commitment, professional obligations and abortion provision after the reversal of Roe v Wade
- When should conscientious objection be accepted?
- Questionable benefits and unavoidable personal beliefs: defending conscientious objection for abortion
- Professional and conscience-based refusals: the case of the psychiatrist's harmful prescription
- Conscientious objection and the referral requirement as morally permissible moral mistakes
- Conscientious objection in healthcare and the duty to refer