Article Text
Abstract
In March 2021, the Spanish Congress approved the law regulating euthanasia, that regulates both euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (PAS). In this article, we analyse the Spanish law regulating euthanasia and PAS, comparing it with the rest of the European laws on euthanasia and PAS (Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg). Identified strengths of the Spanish law, with respect to other norms, are that it is a law with many safeguards, which broadly recognises professionals’ right to conscientious objection and the specification that it makes on the prior comprehensive care of the patient, including the approach to care dependency. Regarding its shortcomings, the law does not differentiate well between euthanasia and PAS; it barely assigns a role to the healthcare team as a whole (similar to other regulations); it does not clarify the functions of the different professionals involved; it does not detail the specific composition and duration of theevaluation commission; it has not been accompanied by a prior or simultaneous regulation of palliative care; and, lastly, the period of time to implement the law is too short.
- euthanasia
- palliative care
- end-of-life
Data availability statement
There are no data in this work.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Data availability statement
There are no data in this work.
Footnotes
Twitter @tayvs15
Contributors TRVS: made substantial contributions to conception of the article, involved in drafting the manuscript and revising it critically for important intellectual content, gave a final approval of the version to be published. PPP: involved in drafting the manuscript and revising it critically for important intellectual content, gave final approval of the version to be published. BM-M: made substantial contributions to conception of the article, gave final approval of the version to be published. LFMH: made substantial contributions to conception of the article, involved in drafting the manuscript. BH: made substantial contributions to conception of the article, involved in drafting the manuscript and revising it critically for important intellectual content, gave final approval of the version to be published.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- The role of nurses in euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in The Netherlands
- Australian pharmacists’ perspectives on physician-assisted suicide (PAS): thematic analysis of semistructured interviews
- French hospital nurses’ opinion about euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: a national phone survey
- Do guidelines on euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in Dutch hospitals and nursing homes reflect the law? A content analysis
- Euthanasia embedded in palliative care. Responses to essentialistic criticisms of the Belgian model of integral end-of-life care
- Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide not meeting due care criteria in the Netherlands: a qualitative review of review committee judgements
- Dealing with requests for euthanasia: a qualitative study investigating the experience of general practitioners
- Data discrepancies: Italian ministry reports on abortion, contextualised
- Can physicians conceive of performing euthanasia in case of psychiatric disease, dementia or being tired of living?
- Legal physician-assisted dying in Oregon and the Netherlands: evidence concerning the impact on patients in “vulnerable” groups