Nocebo effects: a price worth paying for full transparency?
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Funding Brian McMillan and Gail Davidge are funded by an NIHR Advanced Fellowship (NIHR300887).
Disclaimer The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Sharing online clinical notes with patients: implications for nocebo effects and health equity
- Unethical informed consent caused by overlooking poorly measured nocebo effects
- Response to commentaries on sharing online clinical notes with patients: implications for nocebo effects and health equity
- ‘Scan-negative’ cauda equina syndrome: what to do when there is no neurosurgical cause
- Placebo effects and racial and ethnic health disparities: an unjust and underexplored connection
- The nocebo effect: patient expectations and medication side effects
- Multidisciplinary team intervention to reduce the nocebo effect when switching from the originator infliximab to a biosimilar
- Prescribing placebos ethically: the appeal of negatively informed consent
- Cauda equina syndrome
- Understanding cauda equina syndrome: protocol for a UK multicentre prospective observational cohort study