Article info
PDFResponse
Flawed reasoning on two dilemmas: a commentary on Baron and Dierckxsens (2021)
- Correspondence to Florence Ashley, Faculty of Law and Joint Centre for Bioethics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; f.ashley{at}mail.utoronto.ca
Citation
Flawed reasoning on two dilemmas: a commentary on Baron and Dierckxsens (2021)
Publication history
- Received June 3, 2021
- Accepted August 13, 2021
- First published August 27, 2021.
Online issue publication
August 22, 2022
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 August 2021).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Two dilemmas for medical ethics in the treatment of gender dysphoria in youth
- Defending two dilemmas
- Youth should decide: the principle of subsidiarity in paediatric transgender healthcare
- Fertility preservation for transgender children and young people in paediatric healthcare: a systematic review of ethical considerations
- What are the health outcomes of trans and gender diverse young people in Australia? Study protocol for the Trans20 longitudinal cohort study
- High court should not restrict access to puberty blockers for minors
- Gender dysphoria in adolescents: can adolescents or parents give valid consent to puberty blockers?
- Forever young? The ethics of ongoing puberty suppression for non-binary adults
- Perspectives on fertility preservation and parenthood among transgender youth and their parents
- Assessment and support of children and adolescents with gender dysphoria