Article info
PDFOriginal research
Medical ethics when moving towards non-anonymous gamete donation: the views of donors and recipients
- Correspondence to Dr Susana Silva, Instituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto, Rua das Taipas nº135, 4050-600 Porto, Portugal; susilva{at}ispup.up.pt
Citation
Medical ethics when moving towards non-anonymous gamete donation: the views of donors and recipients
Publication history
- Received September 24, 2020
- Revised April 15, 2021
- Accepted May 4, 2021
- First published June 25, 2021.
Online issue publication
November 16, 2022
Article Versions
- Previous version (16 November 2022).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Thinking ethically about genetic inheritance: liberal rights, communitarianism and the right to privacy for parents of donor insemination children
- Ethics briefings
- The ethical case for non-directed postmortem sperm donation
- The rupture of anonymity for sperm donors—a tangled web of conflicting rights
- Mitochondrial donation and ‘the right to know’
- Lowering the age limit of access to the identity of the gamete donor by donor offspring: the argument against
- Fatherlessness, sperm donors and ‘so what?’ parentage: arguing against the immorality of donor conception through ‘world literature’
- Differences between sperm sharing and egg sharing are morally relevant
- Ethics briefings
- Consent agreements for cryopreserved embryos: the case for choice