Article info
PDFCommentary
Embryo research: destiny is what counts
- Correspondence to A/Prof Alex Polyakov, Department of Obstretrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne - Parkville Campus, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia-3052; alex.polyakov{at}mivf.com.au
Citation
Embryo research: destiny is what counts
Publication history
- Received July 11, 2022
- Accepted July 12, 2022
- First published July 20, 2022.
Online issue publication
August 22, 2022
Article Versions
- Previous version (20 July 2022).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Two kinds of embryo research: four case examples
- Creating and sacrificing embryos for stem cells
- Is a consensus possible on stem cell research? Moral and political obstacles
- Reproductive and therapeutic cloning, germline therapy, and purchase of gametes and embryos: comments on Canadian legislation governing reproduction technologies
- How reproductive and regenerative medicine meet in a Chinese fertility clinic. Interviews with women about the donation of embryos to stem cell research
- What’s in a name? Embryos, entities, and ANTities in the stem cell debate
- Embryo deaths in reproduction and embryo research: a reply to Murphy's double effect argument
- Clinical utilisation of a rapid low-pass whole genome sequencing technique for the diagnosis of aneuploidy in human embryos prior to implantation
- A brief and personal history of ‘what’s in a name’ in reproductive genetics
- IVF twins: buy one get one free?