Article Text
PDFEthics briefing
Ethics briefing
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Patients’ and public views and attitudes towards the sharing of health data for research: a narrative review of the empirical evidence
- Conditionally positive: a qualitative study of public perceptions about using health data for artificial intelligence research
- Machine learning models, trusted research environments and UK health data: ensuring a safe and beneficial future for AI development in healthcare
- Multiple modes of data sharing can facilitate secondary use of sensitive health data for research
- Consent and the ethical duty to participate in health data research
- Should free-text data in electronic medical records be shared for research? A citizens’ jury study in the UK
- TREs are still not about trust
- In response to Ballantyne and Schaefer’s ‘Consent and the ethical duty to participate in health data research’
- Development of a data utility framework to support effective health data curation
- Big health data: the need to earn public trust