Article info
PDFOriginal research
Are conscientious objectors morally obligated to refer?
- Correspondence to Dr Samuel Reis-Dennis, Alden March Bioethics Institute, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY 12208, USA; reisdes{at}amc.edu
Citation
Are conscientious objectors morally obligated to refer?
Publication history
- Received October 30, 2020
- Accepted May 14, 2021
- First published July 7, 2021.
Online issue publication
October 18, 2023
Article Versions
- Previous version (22 July 2022).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Professional and conscience-based refusals: the case of the psychiatrist's harmful prescription
- The truth behind conscientious objection in medicine
- Conscientious objection in healthcare: why tribunals might be the answer
- Conscientious objection and the referral requirement as morally permissible moral mistakes
- Conscientious objection in healthcare, referral and the military analogy
- Conscientious objection should not be equated with moral objection: a response to Ben-Moshe
- Female genital alteration: a compromise solution
- Ethics briefings
- Thirty-year trends in the prevalence and severity of female genital mutilation: a comparison of 22 countries
- Rationing conscience