In ‘Ethics of sharing medical knowledge with the community: is the physician responsible for medical outreach during a pandemic?’ Strous and Karni note that the revised physician’s pledge in the World Medical Association Declaration of Geneva obligates individual physicians to share medical knowledge, which they interpret to mean a requirement to share knowledge publicly and through outreach. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, Strous and Karni defend a form of medical paternalism insofar as the individual physician must reach out to communities who may not want, or know to seek out, medical advice, for reasons of public health and health equity. Strous and Karni offer a novel defence of why physicians ought to intervene even in insular communities, and they offer suggestions for how this could be done in culturally sensitive ways. Yet their view rests on an unfounded interpretation of the Geneva Declaration language. More problematically, their paper confuses shared and collective responsibility, misattributing the scope of individual physician obligations in potentially harmful ways. In response, this reply delineates between shared and collective responsibility, and suggests that to defend the obligation of medical outreach Strous and Karni propose, it is better conceptualised as a collective responsibility of the medical profession, rather than a shared responsibility of individual physicians. This interpretation rejects paternalism on the part of individual providers in favour of a more sensitive and collaborative practice of knowledge sharing between physicians and communities, and in the service of collective responsibility.
- health promotion
- applied and professional ethics
- codes of/position statements on professional ethics
- cultural pluralism
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Contributors EL is the sole contributor to this paper.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Ethics of sharing medical knowledge with the community: is the physician responsible for medical outreach during a pandemic?
- Barriers to decolonising educational partnerships in global health
- Responsibility in healthcare across time and agents
- Victims, vectors and villains: are those who opt out of vaccination morally responsible for the deaths of others?
- Reclaiming comprehensive public health
- Public participation in genetic databases: crossing the boundaries between biobanks and forensic DNA databases through the principle of solidarity
- Food hygiene, public health education and citizenship in Britain, 1948–1967
- Primary care physicians’ willingness to disclose oncology errors involving multiple providers to patients
- Reducing COVID-19 risk in schools: a qualitative examination of secondary school staff and family views and concerns in the South West of England
- Transferring responsibility and accountability in maternity care: clinicians defining their boundaries of practice in relation to clinical handover