Article info
PDFResponse
Why appeals to the moral significance of birth are saddled with a dilemma
- Correspondence to Dr Christopher A Bobier, Saint Mary's University of Minnesota, Winona, MN 55987, USA; cbobier{at}smumn.edu
Citation
Why appeals to the moral significance of birth are saddled with a dilemma
Publication history
- Received February 18, 2021
- Revised March 10, 2021
- Accepted March 21, 2021
- First published March 31, 2021.
Online issue publication
November 16, 2022
Article Versions
- Previous version (16 November 2022).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Dilemma for appeals to the moral significance of birth
- Birth, meaningful viability and abortion
- Infanticide and moral consistency
- Does birth matter?
- The pearl of the ‘Pro-Life’ movement? Reflections on the Kermit Gosnell controversy
- The Israeli abortion committees' process of decision making: an ethical analysis
- The moral status of babies
- Why there is no dilemma for the birth strategy: a response to Bobier and Omelianchuk
- Avoiding anomalous newborns: preemptive abortion, treatment thresholds and the case of baby Messenger
- Limitations on personhood arguments for abortion and ‘after-birth abortion’